Do you think the actual diagnostic criteria is being used all the time, or are kids who "may be at risk" being diagnosed as well. I ask because I met a boy, age 3 who’s Mom said he was diagnosed with autism at 2. This boy was referencing her from across a playground, playing with another child, came when she called him, and answered questions appropriately. I saw nothing that resembled autism. I have a child with autism, and have met many, so it’s not like I have no experience, though I know I’m not a diagnosticician. I know early intervention is important, but 1 year of intervention makes autism disappear? I question the correctness of the diagnosis. Wondering if anyone else has seen examples like this.
Along those same lines, if you have a child diagnosed with autism…At what age? Do you feel it was accurate? How old is your child now and how are they doing? What therapy have you used. Do you think your child will be cured or be unidentifiable in the future? Thanks.
Posted in 
Tags: 
I do believe it is overdiagnosed. It is a subjective test and depending on who administers the test and their beliefs, the diagnosis could be different; particularly with children who are on the cusp.
There are many studies showing lead poisoning is sometimes mistaken for autism. Just look on pubmed and you’ll see – it’s the case for ADHD as well.
http://www.bluedominoes.com does a good job of providing links to some studies and they have personal stories as well. A lot more children have lead poisoning then most people realize and it can be misdiagnosed. According to the CDC 1 in 22 kids have elevated blood lead levels.